| Neckarsulmer 45.5% | Draw 23.7% | Hollenbach 30.8% |
| Neckarsulmer 35.6% | Draw 23.7% | Hollenbach 40.8% |
| Neckarsulmer 36% | Draw 23.4% | Hollenbach 40.3% |
Neckarsulmer has improved its chances compared to the initial analysis. (+9.9%)
Note: This is a significant improvement in prediction, suggesting increased confidence in Neckarsulmer's performance.
Hollenbach has seen a decrease in its chances compared to the initial analysis. (-10%)
Note: This is a significant drop in prediction, and Hollenbach might be facing challenges that affect their performance.
ML Model estimates a lower probability for Neckarsulmer than the current prediction. (-9.5%)
Note: The ML model's lower estimate suggests that there may be underlying issues with Neckarsulmer that the model has picked up on.
ML Model estimates a higher probability for Hollenbach than the current prediction. (+9.5%)
Note: The ML model's higher estimate suggests that Hollenbach could outperform expectations, possibly based on recent matchups or player stats.
| 1 | X | 2 | Marga | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avarage Now (Initially) |
1.99 ↓ (2.53) |
3.82 ↑ (3.8) |
2.94 ↑ (2.21) |
10.5% (11.3%) |
| Pl | W | D | L | Diff | Pts | |||
| 1 | Grossaspach | 29 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 91:19 | 72 | 83 |
| 2 | Balingen | 29 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 73:35 | 38 | 69 |
| 3 | VfR Mannheim | 29 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 60:36 | 24 | 57 |
| 4 | Aalen | 29 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 51:27 | 24 | 50 |
| 5 | Pforzheim | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 49:38 | 11 | 48 |
| 6 | Oberachern | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 42:31 | 11 | 48 |
| 7 | Nottingen | 29 | 14 | 4 | 11 | 65:43 | 22 | 46 |
| 8 | Normannia Gmund | 29 | 13 | 3 | 13 | 54:51 | 3 | 42 |
| 9 | Backnang | 29 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 48:41 | 7 | 40 |
| 10 | Hollenbach | 29 | 11 | 5 | 13 | 39:49 | -10 | 38 |
| 11 | Bietigheim-Bissingen | 29 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 45:47 | -2 | 37 |
| 12 | Essingen | 29 | 11 | 4 | 14 | 36:40 | -4 | 37 |
| 13 | Reutlingen | 29 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 41:49 | -8 | 36 |
| 14 | Ravensburg | 29 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 29:44 | -15 | 31 |
| 15 | Zuzenhausen | 29 | 8 | 3 | 18 | 38:72 | -34 | 27 |
| 16 | Fellbach | 29 | 8 | 3 | 18 | 31:70 | -39 | 27 |
| 17 | Leinfelden-Echterdingen | 29 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 31:71 | -40 | 15 |
| 18 | Villingen II | 29 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 25:85 | -60 | 9 |
